Tag: COVID-19

  • Understaffed, Underfunded: Wisconsin Public Health and COVID-19

    Understaffed, Underfunded: Wisconsin Public Health and COVID-19

    An interview with Beth Borkowski by Dayna Long

    This interview has been edited for clarity and length.

    DL: Tell me about your educational and professional background.

    BB: My first degree is in psychology. Then I worked in the senior living world for about a decade before going back to school for my nursing degree. I graduated last year and have, up until pretty recently, worked in public health.

    DL: Oh, senior living. So you have a lot of experience in one of the settings that have become known for COVID-19 outbreaks. 

    BB: I still talk to some of my friends that I worked with, and it’s not been very pretty there. Even thinking back to when I worked there, there’s just not a lot of familiarity with various types of PPE. People know what it is but you’re just not used to working with it on all the time, though I’m sure they’re used to it now. And then just the insidious nature of COVID – just the way it can transmit makes it very dangerous in that kind of setting. A fairly large portion of the deaths – I want to say almost half of them – have been in long-term care settings. And the hard part is you can’t control where workers go after hours, so if you have even one employee that doesn’t take it seriously, your entire population is at risk. That makes it really hard for them.

    DL: During this pandemic, you were working in public health outside of Dane County. What can you share about how the pandemic has been playing out outside of Madison?

    BB: I was in a more rural county. What the challenge usually is in rural counties is that their hospitals tend to be smaller, with fewer ICU beds and a lot less speciality care in general. I worked in the communicable disease program before the pandemic, and I would call anyone who had a new hepatitis diagnosis. We didn’t have one hepatologist in the entire county, so [patients] would always have to go to Madison or Milwaukee.

    When you have a new illness like [COVID-19] that needs very specialized care, a lot of times [patients] end up being transferred to Madison or Milwaukee anyway. So when more rural areas write it off as a Madison problem or a big city problem, they do that lacking the knowledge that their own local areas can get overwhelmed very quickly. And then if the “big cities” are overwhelmed, their communities will have nowhere to send people.

    The other thing that was really hard is the pandemic has become a political issue. We would call each person who tested positive and try to do contact tracing and give them guidance. And when the existence of the pandemic or encouraging people to wear masks is a political thing, those calls are very difficult. At least one person I called literally did not believe [the positive test result] because they did not believe the tests were accurate. I had to try to ask all of the questions I was supposed to ask, but it was like, “Well why did you go get tested if you won’t even believe the results when they come back? What’s the purpose of going and getting your nose swabbed if you weren’t going to listen?”

    We ended up running into that a lot. People would refuse to give us any contacts or they would say, ‘Well I don’t feel sick, I don’t have any symptoms,” so they would refuse to quarantine. Or they would give contacts but then those contacts would be like, “Well, I’m not doing that,” or they’d say, “Yeah, okay,” but you could tell they weren’t going to follow the instructions. 

    It’s also kind of hard because – like with [tuberculosis] patients, in my time there, I didn’t have anybody who actively had TB, but the other nurse I worked with had had a number and if there was anybody who refused to isolate while they had this very contagious condition, they could rely on local law enforcement to enforce quarantine orders. A lot of times once you had a quarantine officially imposed, people would follow it. You had mechanisms to ensure people were not putting others at risk. I feel like, because it’s become politicized, we’ve lost any ability to enforce for the public protection. I think that’s really caused it to spread a lot further than it would have otherwise.

    DL: What about testing? In Dane County we’ve got this drive-up test site at the Alliant Energy Center where anyone can get tested for free throughout the week. Was there a site like that in the county you were working in?  

    BB: No. The local hospital we worked with – their testing was free. But they would not test anyone who did not have symptoms unless they had the specific instructions from public health, for instance like if a group home worker had an exposure or this is somebody with immunocompromised family members who had an exposure. So we could usually authorize initial testing. But the way the Alliant Energy Center [test site] works, where you can just show up with no questions asked about why you think you need testing, that didn’t exist. There were multiple times when, even though for some people in our county it was an hour drive, we still presented Alliant as the only option where they would be able to get tested in their situation.

    We do tell people even if they get a negative test, because you can just not have a high enough viral load, you’re supposed to quarantine for fourteen days. So sometimes in medicine we ask, “What will be different if you’re tested?” For a lot of people who don’t have symptoms who have been instructed to quarantine, being tested wouldn’t necessarily change anything. But there are situations where, you know, if you have two parents and they have a child they’re caring for and they were both exposed but asymptomatic, knowing if one tested positive or not would be helpful in knowing who can care for the child. So it is useful. But I know that a lot of places don’t have the access Dane has to testing.

    DL: Most of us are aware of the rising case counts, hospitalizations, and deaths in Wisconsin. I think we’re less aware of how public health professionals and health care  workers are holding up in this crisis. What can you share about that? 

    BB: It’s something I’m very concerned about. I think the public – and even other health professionals – don’t really know what public health does. I applied [to be a public health nurse] having done like a rural immersion where we went up to a Northern county and worked in their public health area for three weeks. And even having that experience I didn’t know all the things that our health department would be doing when I was hired. Like making care plans for kids in the low-income pre-k program called Head Start. We’re involved in training teachers if an EpiPen is needed for a student. I did the jail vaccine program where we’d go in and offer different vaccines to people who were incarcerated in the local jail. Honestly I think I miss that more than anything else because, having a positive interaction with people who were maybe having the worst month of their life, and giving them a positive interaction with somebody in health care when most of their interactions had probably been negative preceding it was really validating of what I was doing or of what public health could do. Even doing things like fluoride varnish to help prevent cavities in kids who maybe didn’t have access to dentists.

    So I think what’s most upsetting to me is, I’d say in most health departments across the country, these things are not being done now because it’s all COVID, all the time. Public health is always a hard sell for why it should be funded. People see why you should fund treatment but they don’t always understand funding prevention. So public health is chronically underfunded at a national and a state and a county level. They were very staff-strapped and cash-strapped before the pandemic. I know our county didn’t staff up.  There was like a skepticism at the administrative level that such things could be afforded even though it’s like a pandemic, and there’s statutory requirements to respond to a communicable disease. It felt kind of exploitative. When you’re also in a community where half the community doesn’t think the pandemic is real, you can see where that’s coming from.

    I think we’re going to see a mass burnout of public health workers. You’re working all the time for a really extended period of time. As a more direct-level worker, I didn’t really see it, but I know that on the management and the Health Officer level, the public facing people, they’re getting death threats. I know our health officer got death threats. The Madison-Dane County officer got death threats. She’s had protests at her house. There’s public meetings where the county boards vote on expanding actions to prevent further spread during the pandemic and people show up, won’t wear masks, cram in to speak about something, and then get very threatening and make threats at the Health Officer or other people who are just trying to take steps to protect lives basically. 

    We’ve already seen people leave over that. I know a number of states have lost their top health officer for the state and a lot of counties, I think, have or will lose their health officers. I know Sauk County’s health officer just quit. I don’t know if I’ve specifically seen names in other counties but I know it’s got to be a rough time for everybody involved.

    DL: When people think of overwhelmed hospitals, I think most of us imagine hospitals running out of actual physical space, but you’ve pointed out that the number of caregivers is also a factor. 

    BB: When I was in nursing school I did a brief research project on the healthcare worker shortage. It’s better in Madison and Milwaukee and surrounding areas, but pre-pandemic there was a shortage of nurses, providers, and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) in most rural areas, like particularly up North. It’s particularly bad for psychiatrists or people who can prescribe psychiatric medications. 

    The CNA shortage is actually pretty bad. A few years ago the Democrats in the state tried to increase the pay rate for CNAs at state-run facilities, in the hopes that it would also rise in private industry, and that was shot down by the Republicans in the state legislature in favor of trying to reduce the number of hours of training required to get a CNA. So they thought that was the barrier for people wanting to go into the field. 

    You can start surging spaces, you can put two patients in a room if you have to, but you can’t just conjure up more nurses or doctors.

    Having been a direct caregiver before, when I worked in senior living, it’s a very difficult job, especially if you’re working in a place where people have memory loss or cognitive issues or a psychiatric diagnosis. I would work in our memory neighborhood and you get people who are physically aggressive because they’re not aware of what’s going on. You’re dealing with bodily fluids. You could probably make more money at Target down the street. It’s not like a living wage where you can sustain a family off of it. It’s very difficult for people to stay in the field long-term. Even in Madison there’s a CNA shortage but it’s particularly bad in rural areas. King VA actually started closing beds in the Veteran’s nursing home just because they couldn’t find enough staff to actually care for people. 

    You can start surging spaces, you can put two patients in a room if you have to, but you can’t just conjure up more nurses or doctors. I think that’s kind of going to be one of the barriers if we keep seeing hospitalizations.

    DL: You’ve talked about this a little bit already but how has the politicization of COVID-19 changed the public health response to the pandemic in Wisconsin? How are things supposed to work compared to what’s actually happening here?

    BB: It became a very big concern for me when things were presented as a choice between either economics or saving lives. There’s definitely a middle ground where you can help people who are struggling economically from the impact of the pandemic but also protect people. But you had people on one side saying “Every measure possible to save lives,” which I think makes a lot of sense, and the other which was like, “No, we shouldn’t do anything because that will hurt the economy.” But if people are dying because of a pandemic running rampant, you’re still going to have economic impacts. People aren’t going to want to go shopping or to a movie or out to eat when they know they can catch a deadly virus. By keeping the virus under control, you’re also providing some of that economic protection. 

    I would have liked to see the government step in more to help people who are in tough economic situations as well. One of the places we would see a lot of cases before things got pretty bad recently would be in workplace settings, because people wouldn’t want to call in sick. Or we would basically have employers telling the workers like, “No you have to come in to work anyway. We need you here.” And then when we would call and say “Hey, you have an outbreak in your workplace, you have to take these measures,” They would say, “Oh yeah, yeah, we do all that, we have people stay home, we mask, we distance,” I think because people feel like forced to go into work, we’ve seen it spread a lot more, and when people don’t have some of the economic support as a business, they’re more likely to pressure people to work in situations when they shouldn’t. So it’s all kind of a self-fulfilling prophecy almost. 

    Making that political, like “We need to prioritize business. We’re not going to support those businesses with policy but we need all businesses open as much as possible,” furthered the spread and made things much more difficult in our country than they had been in other countries. 

    It’s not just the way we’ve politicized the virus, but the way our political system is set up. We never were going to handle the virus well here.

    In Europe, for all the businesses that paid people to stay home, that kept people on the payroll, still paying some portion of their income, the government subsidized those businesses instead of having businesses lay off a bunch of people and then the government paying unemployment. I feel like that would have been a much better way to handle everything and it’s a reason we have seen fewer cases in Europe, one of many reasons. We also don’t have any universal healthcare, so we’re also at a disadvantage because if people lose their jobs, they lose their healthcare and then they delay going in for care if they do get COVID. 

    It’s not just the way we’ve politicized the virus, but the way our political system is set up. We never were going to handle the virus well here. Back in February when you could kind of see how this was spreading and becoming a pandemic, I think one of the things I was most afraid of is that our country would be uniquely unable to handle this because of the poor policies we have at a ground level. 

    There are a set of powers that a health officer has for protecting their county in case of a communicable disease. A lot of them have been in place for a really long time, since before the advent of a lot of vaccines and antibiotics that have helped protect us from pandemics being a regular thing. For a lot of public health professionals, you can point to the moment when the state Supreme Court struck down the Safer At Home order as the moment everything turned for our state. After that happened, I know a lot of counties wanted to issue their own Safer At Home orders and you had the legal bodies of counties saying, “Well no, now it’s been deemed against the state constitution, our state laws,” And so health officers don’t have that power even though it’s right there in the state statutes. 

    I think a lot of health departments also know that even if they’re in the right, they weren’t going to be able to [issue new orders] for lack of political will in their community. And it made people err too far in the other direction. They didn’t want to issue any kind of orders for fear that the whole chapter [of the state statutes] itemizing health officer powers would be deemed invalid and that they’d get sued and taken to the Supreme Court.

    DL: We know that there are big COVID-19 outbreaks in some Wisconsin prisons. What can you share about the risks incarcerated people are facing right now? What should the state be doing differently? Why do you think the DOC isn’t being transparent about COVID-19 deaths in prisons? 

    BB: I have a particular interest in correctional health. It was an area I considered working in as a nurse before I realized you have a lot of peer pressure to follow institutional rules that maybe aren’t in the best interest of the patient – I’ll put it that way. I had one of my clinicals in the state infirmary which is at Dodge Correctional. So I have some experience providing nursing care in a prison setting. 

    It’s actually very hard to find nurses, doctors, psychiatrists, who want to work in prisons. So they’re actually pretty short-staffed, too, even pre-COVID. I was able to use that fact to shadow nurses in quite a few settings, so I’ve been to the one federal prison in Wisconsin, a couple of state prisons, and at least three county jails. I know a little bit about how they provide care in a pre-pandemic setting and I can only imagine that it’s really hard to provide adequate care in this kind of situation. Even quarantine and isolation. Really the only way you could [have someone quarantine] is to have them stay in an individual cell for basically the entire time. So anytime you see that they’re quarantining or isolating somebody in a correctional setting, I don’t see how they could do it aside from solitary confinement. They would call it something different, but they’re basically having that person stay in a cell that entire time so that they’re not around other prisoners or guards or staff. 

    I have tried to read as much as you can from the outside and I’ve heard a lot of reports that people aren’t being allowed masks in prisons. I was actually reading through the mask mandate today for work and individuals who are incarcerated are actually exempt from the mask mandate. So I found that exception very interesting. I know it’s very difficult to have things like hand sanitizer in the prison setting because there’s always the fear that people will drink it to try to have some kind of intoxicating effect from it, whether that’s a likely outcome or not. It can even be hard to have adequate access to other hygiene products. So I just imagine it kind of spreads very quickly in those settings. 

    Our prisons in Wisconsin are overcrowded under normal circumstances. I think basically every prison we have is over capacity, so that doesn’t allow for very much social distancing. I’ve been in some of the general population areas where there’s basically bunk beds packed in a room. I don’t think you could get six feet apart in most places like that. Some places have tried to be better at releasing people who are incarcerated. Dane County was more successful than others. At the state level, they only released like a thousand people but we have somewhere around 25,000 people incarcerated normally. So I don’t know that they made that big of a dent. 

    The industry is very reluctant [to release people] because then the question gets asked, “Well, why were those people incarcerated if there were other options?” and so there’s a counter incentive to being aggressive about finding people that could safely be outside of prison and jails.

    A lot of the prison population is at a higher risk for adverse outcomes anyway because people that are incarcerated for a life or a long-term sentence – basically they appear ten to fifteen years older than their chronological age because you just see an earlier onset of old age diseases. You’ll see heart disease much earlier, diabetes much earlier, heart attacks, stroke much earlier, just like general worse health partially because of not very nutritious diets, a lack of exercise, a lack of space, and I would think despair probably factors in there. A lot of people have a history of smoking before they’re incarcerated so there’s a lot of chronic lung disease. You would expect worse outcomes compared to other people who aren’t incarcerated at the same age. 

    It’s pretty well-documented that there’s kind of a graying of the prison system. So there’s a lot of people who are in their fifties or sixties because they were given a life sentence. You know, if you were arrested in your thirties because of the three strikes rule during the nineties, you’re approaching your sixties at this time. That was a lot of what we saw during my clinical there, a lot of people who just had chronic conditions related to being in prison for so long.

    DL: Imagine for a second that as a country we had the political will to make any changes we wanted to make people safe starting tomorrow. What things would make the biggest difference right now to keep people healthy and safe? What do public health and healthcare professionals need?  

    BB: Our lack of a universal healthcare system is a big thing. There’s nothing more heartbreaking as a nurse than calling and counseling a patient about what to do and who then says, “Would I have to go to the hospital if I’m having trouble breathing? I don’t have any health insurance and I can’t afford it.” You know? Trying to figure out what to tell them and trying to explain, “Well, if you’re having these symptoms, maybe you can wait a little longer but definitely if your fingers are turning blue, go to the hospital. So if we had a system of healthcare that covers everybody so that affordability is not a worry, you would see people seeking care sooner, you’d see people getting treatment sooner, being diagnosed sooner. I think that would’ve really helped. 

    Similarly we have no universal sick leave for workers. And if you think not having universal health care and sick leave policies doesn’t affect you, go to any fast food restaurant where people work part time at minimum wage and can’t afford to take off work, you’re going to be exposed to whatever they have. It really does affect everybody if you’re looking at it from a purely selfish point of view. 

    There’s nothing more heartbreaking as a nurse than calling and counseling a patient about what to do and who then says, “Would I have to go to the hospital if I’m having trouble breathing? I don’t have any health insurance and I can’t afford it.”

    The whole way the US is set up, really, made us so susceptible for this to spread. The fact that our minimum wage is not liveable – I would have people begging me not to have them quarantine because they couldn’t afford to miss the paycheck or they’d say “I don’t know how I can get food for the rest of the two weeks,” or, “I have to pay my rent. What do I do?” When such a huge portion of our country is living paycheck to paycheck we’re just not going to weather this as well. 

    I don’t know if there’s a way we could policy our way out of the politicization of a crisis like this. Having better leadership would help. We did have a pandemic playbook. It’s funny – as we saw how this could be playing out back in February, I’d go home from work and on my own time I would print out “How to Mass Distribute a Vaccine,” what are non-pharmacological interventions, so like social distancing, and masks, and closing schools if needed and stuff like that. We have had a lot of those [plans] for a long time and they just were not utilized. Instead they were mocked and made fun of and I don’t think that helped anything. We threw out the whole playbook so funding for public health and funding for public education around public health are both really essential. 

    As of 2016, Wisconsin was the third worst funded state for public health. So public health funding so that we could have a robust workforce would also really help. If you don’t have enough staffing to even keep up with the cases coming in. Public health does so much stuff to prevent childhood illness, maternal mortality, preventable illnesses and spread of communicable disease normally that funding it properly would also be pretty high on my policy request list. 

    For healthcare workers in general, I’ve thought a lot about how we get more people into healthcare. I have to say for nurses one of the biggest issues is that there’s actually a shortage of nursing instructors. To be a nursing instructor at UW and at most nursing schools, you need to have a doctoral degree in nursing, a DNP. It’s the same degree you need to be a nurse practitioner. So you would have to go back to school, get that degree, and you could become a nurse practitioner and make $90,000-$100,000 a year or be a nursing instructor and make $60,000 a year, which is not that dissimilar to what you were making before going back to school for that degree and going into debt. So paying nursing instructors more, incentivizing becoming an instructor. Student loans in general are a huge problem, but health care workers self-sacrifice a lot on a normal day. So having mechanisms of student loan forgiveness, especially during a pandemic, would help keep people in the field but also maybe bring more people in. 

    I think there are a lot of policies that would improve the country that would also have a positive effect on preventing the spread of a pandemic.

  • I’m Using My Stimulus Check to Pay For An Abortion

    I’m Using My Stimulus Check to Pay For An Abortion

    Shared Anonymously

    I am using my stimulus check to pay for an abortion. 

    As I went from Day 35 with no period, to Day 36, 37, 38, I thought seriously about what to do if this wasn’t just a late period. It became very clear that getting an abortion was the right choice for me, my husband, and my family in this moment. We have a 15-month-old and we want a second kid, but the thought of a pregnancy, a birth, and a second baby  amid a pandemic – when we could lose our jobs, when a hospital delivery could be dangerous and isolating, when our out-of-state and elderly parents couldn’t travel to help in those early weeks of parenthood – is terrifying. In fact, were it not for the pandemic, we very well could have made a different decision. As Republican governors across the country question whether abortion is an essential service in these times, I know it absolutely is—all the more so because of these times. 

    Though we made this decision quickly, my husband and I didn’t make it lightly. It didn’t take long for other thoughts to creep in. I felt dumb for getting pregnant: I miscarried two years ago after trying to conceive for a year, and I have a toddler. I know exactly how this works. I felt shame for making this decision: isn’t this a frivolous reason to do something so serious? Aren’t abortions reserved for when you really need it? Of course, my internalized guilt couldn’t specify who should get to determine justified need. Will people I love hate me? That wasn’t even a question, because I knew at least some would. The real question was whether they knew they hated me specifically when they spoke in generalities about the sanctity of life and abortion as murder. Is this the burden that people I love who have had abortions have carried with them for decades? 

    How dare this society make women hate our bodies, make us want to hide them away, perfectly priming me to think I don’t even deserve to control mine?

    As I type this, I hear my husband on the phone with his mom. She loves us and supports us, and also has concerns about the burden of going through with this. Is this how stigma creeps into relationships? Wedging itself, word by loaded word, into conversations? Creating silence and one-word responses where there should be jokes and laughter?

    Also while writing this, I bought myself a swimsuit for Mother’s Day (“for” is generous, quite frankly, that just happened to be the nearest excuse on the calendar for retail therapy). As a mother I am more in awe of my body than ever before. I’ve always hated most of it; on a good day, only parts of it. But my body is amazing. It creates life, it nourishes life, and somehow it keeps me going, too. How dare this society make women hate our bodies, make us want to hide them away, perfectly priming me to think I don’t even deserve to control mine?

    Before moving to Madison I lived in Washington, DC and volunteered as a clinic defense escort at a Planned Parenthood just a few blocks from the White House. I saw Catholics pray in circles in front of the clinic. I witnessed white Anti-choicers harass Black patients with race-baiting arguments. For years, I heard dehumanizing hate spewed along the clinic sidewalk week after week after week. 

    Last week, when I arrived at Madison’s East Side Planned Parenthood, I saw a lone old white man wearing a sandwich board that explained contraception as “chemical pornography.” Of all his slogans, that one was actually the most logical; the others I couldn’t make enough sense of to remember. He yelled when I got out of my car, lazily, in my general direction. I was already  frustrated by the fact that I couldn’t exercise basic autonomy over my body in this moment – by the fact that I had to be treated like a child, forced to wait a week to make sure there were no take-backs – and I was in no mood for this harassment. I stared him down and yelled “Sir you can go straight to hell.” This time, he acknowledged me directly and yelled back: “You think you’ve changed my mind but you haven’t.” I don’t think he got the irony of the moment. I told him “Right back at you,” but I still think it went over his head. When I left the clinic two hours later, he was still there, joined now by an old white woman saying the rosary. I flipped both of them off as I drove home.

    Inside the clinic, the staff was kind, compassionate, and respectful. I was there just for a consultation. Due to a 1996 law I have to wait 24 hours before actually having an abortion. Due to a 2012 law I have to be seen by the same doctor for my consultation and abortion, and because of limited staffing (no doubt due to ideologically-driven funding cuts) that meant the 24-hour waiting period would be a full week.

    During my consultation, a staff person explained the process of a medicated abortion. First, I would take a pill called mifepristone to block hormones from reaching the small, almost invisible cluster of cells inside my uterus (thanks to a 2013 law she was forced to conduct an ultrasound of this cluster of cells and show it to me, though I was not obligated to look. I looked anyway; the flowery covering on the overhead fluorescent light I was staring blankly at made me feel pitied, and I did not want to be pitied.). Then, I would take a pill called misoprostol to tell my uterus to contract and expel those cells. 

    In February 2018, I underwent almost the exact same thing after learning that a pregnancy I desperately wanted had stopped developing at 9 weeks. It was heartbreaking and traumatic, and the physical and emotional memory of that moment will stay with me forever. At the time of my miscarriage, pharmacists from Michigan to Arizona were denying misoprostol for women suffering from the trauma of miscarriage because it is used in abortion. In my consultation, the staff person told me doctors here are also having trouble prescribing mifepristone for other uses because of its link to abortion.

    Mothers know the physical burden of parenting: our bodies are not our own for 9 months as they are sapped and stretched to grow a little human.We know the emotional and mental burden of setting aside every other pressure in life to take care of this vulnerable, frustrating, perfect little one we’ve brought into the world. We know the financial burden of simply trying to survive. 

    Because I had taken misoprostol before, and because surgical abortion can be more than twice as expensive, I opted for the medicated abortion. My insurer stopped covering abortion years ago, so my costs would be out of pocket. My only concern was whether the prescriptions would affect breastfeeding; it’s a question you get used to asking as a nursing mom. The staff person told me it was a common question to ask. Let that sink in for a moment: people seeking abortions commonly ask if the medication they will need to take will interact with breastfeeding, because they already have small children at home. 

    Mothers know the physical burden of parenting: our bodies are not our own for 9 months as they are sapped and stretched to grow a little human; add another 6 months, or year, or more onto that if you nurse your baby. We know the emotional and mental burden of setting aside every other pressure in life to take care of this vulnerable, frustrating, perfect little one we’ve brought into the world. We know the financial burden of simply trying to survive; daycare costs more than my mortgage, and in Madison we were fortunate to even find an opening when we needed one. 

    At the end of my consultation, I met with the doctor who would prescribe my medicated abortion. She was legally required to read a two-and-a-half page document to me, telling me such things as:

    • “The numerical odds of survival for an unborn child delivered at that probable gestational age.” Zero percent.
    • “The probable anatomical and physiological characteristics of the fetus on this date.” Literally none. At just over 5 weeks, I had an embryo inside me, not a fetus, and my mandatory ultrasound showed a gestational sac that even to a trained eye looked empty.
    • “The medical risks associated with the particular abortion procedure that would be used, including the risk of infection, psychological trauma, hemorrhage, endometritis, perforated uterus, incomplete abortion, failed abortion, or danger to subsequent pregnancies and infertility.” I am more worried about the actual trauma of pregnancy and childbirth in COVID than the feigned concern of anti-choice zealots.
    • “That no payment for the procedure may be required from me until at least 24 hours have elapsed after the informed consent consultation has been completed, except if the waiting period is shortened by me because the pregnancy is the result of sexual assult or incest or medical emergency.” What must it be like to pass through the world with a body whose autonomy is not conditional? With a body that demands respect and trust wherever it goes, whatever it does?
    • “A list of providers that would perform the required ultrasound at no cost to me.” Conveniently, there’s a very pink “crisis pregnancy center” just across the street from Planned Parenthood that I’m sure would be thrilled to talk to me. Unfortunately for the “crisis pregnancy center,” I was already seeing an actual healthcare provider—who coincidentally just gave me a mandatory ultrasound.
    • “That the man responsible for pregnancy is liable for providing assistance in supporting my child, if born, even if he has offered to pay for the abortion.” Maybe I’m naive, but I wasn’t expecting racist dog whistles on healthcare paperwork.
    • “That I have the right to receive and review, free of charge, state-printed materials that describe the unborn child and list agencies that offer alternatives to abortion.” I will never understand why lawmakers think a person makes an appointment for an abortion without first considering whether they want an abortion. I am at Planned Parenthood because I want and need their services, not because I’m window shopping.
    • “That I have the right to receive and review, free of charge, information on the availability of public and private agencies and services that provide birth control information including natural family planning information; information on services available for victims or individuals at risk of domestic abuse; information about legal protections for me and my child should I wish to oppose establishment of paternity or to terminate the father’s parental rights; and information on the availability of perinatal hospice.” Republican lawmakers, I would like to inform you that natural family planning is the reason I need an abortion right now. 

    And now, I wait a week. A week of nausea and exhaustion where each time I feel like puking is a reminder that people will think I’m a murderer. A week of waiting where I am acutely aware that this nausea means that what is inside of me could grow into a human – like my son did – or it could grow into a lump of miscarried cells that I would have to pass just as I did over two years ago. A week of feeling selfish, stupid, and every other message people in need of abortions have internalized as a result of decades of anti-choice stigma. This waiting period is not helping me make my decision. This waiting period is making me feel like shit – my body wracked by the early stages of a pregnancy I do not want, my head and heart weighed down by the shame that other people say I should feel. 

    It will be a long week.

  • There Is A Public Health Crisis in Dane County

    There Is A Public Health Crisis in Dane County

    By Liam Manjon

    This was originally published on Free the 350 Bail Fund’s blog and is reprinted here with permission from the author, who is an organizer with Free the 350 Bail Fund and also a member of DSA. To contribute directly to Free the 350 Bail Fund and help free individuals incarcerated at the Dane County Jail visit Free the 350 Bail Fund’s website

    A public health crisis that was entirely avoidable had elected officials, judges and state department of corrections officials acted proactively to stop the spread of the deadly Covid-19 virus is now underway. After weeks of inaction by the sheriff, there are now myriad folks testing positive for the virus inside the Dane County jail. On Tuesday April 21 it was announced that 16 out of 22 people FROM A SINGLE pod have tested positive for COVID-19 and as a result the Dane County Sheriff has arranged for the National Guard to come into the jail and test everybody.

    In the meantime, there are people who continue to exit and enter the jail, spreading the coronavirus to the broader community, which will result in the deaths of people in our neighborhoods due to the negligence of elected officials, judges, and state Department of Corrections officials. While increased testing being called for by the Sheriff in the jail  is of course needed in order to be able to form cogent public policy to curb the spread of the deadly virus, the need to release people from the jails is imminent and pressing and should not be held off another day. COVID-19 could claim the lives of approximately 100,000 more people across the U.S. than current projections stipulate if jail populations are not dramatically and immediately reduced, according to a new epidemiological model released on April 26 by the ACLU and academic research partners. “The revolving doors of jails make them a tinderbox for COVID-19 spread within our communities.”

    The lives of people in the community are at risk, yet elected officials, judges and Department of Corrections officials continue to drag their feet on what is a no-brainer of a solution – releasing people from the closed quarters of the jail, where social distancing is impossible. And indeed, elected officials, judges and Department of Corrections officials DO have the authority to release people from the jail. The Sheriff can place people on electronic monitoring, the Department of Corrections can release people’s probation/parole holds, the judges can change bails to signature bonds, the District Attorney can drop charges against people, the Dane County Board of Supervisors can reduce the operating budget of the jail, and Governor Evers has the power to commute the sentences of incarcerated people.

    Although the death rate from the virus among the general population is extremely high, due to baked in racism in the systems of our white supremacist patriarchal capitalist society, it is EVEN HIGHER for Black, Indigenous and People of Color, which Dane County consistently, disproportionately, locks up in the Dane County jail. Therefore, it is a life and death proposition when considering whether or not to free people from the jail.

    Folks who are incarcerated are essentially being served a death sentence by leaving them exposed to the virus without the ability to practice life saving social distancing measures and without being provided with sufficient Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Although the death rate from the virus among the general population is extremely high, due to baked in racism in the systems of our white supremacist patriarchal capitalist society, it is EVEN HIGHER for Black, Indigenous and People of Color, which Dane County consistently, disproportionately, locks up in the Dane County jail. Therefore, it is a life and death proposition when considering whether or not to free people from the jail.

    We have heard that one of the methods that the Sheriff has been utilizing to deal with the virus spreading in the jail is to lock people up in solitary confinement in an attempt to socially isolate them from the rest of the population. Solitary confinement is a form of torture and is considered a human rights abuse by the UN and other international bodies and is an unethical and ineffective tactic to employ during a pandemic.

    Keeping people in close quarter cages during a pandemic is a cruel and unusual punishment, which is protected against in the eighth amendment of the constitution, which the elected officials are apparently ignoring. 

    More than 100 people have died across the countries in the jails and prisons so far, and the number is sure to rise should there continue to be no action taken. 

    The evidence is compelling and undeniable that we must free them all or be responsible for untold deaths. To put the icing on the cake, there is no proof that incarcerating people ACTUALLY reduces crime or violence in society, in fact there is evidence to the contrary, incarcerating people in jails and prisons increases crime and violence so the argument for keeping them in there is non existent.

     Additionally, there is much precedent for freeing people. So far many countries including, Iran, Turkey, Ethiopia, Indonesia, India, Morocco and the UK have freed hundreds of thousands of people from their jails and prisons, recognizing the public health crisis that it poses. California, Washington and Ohio have, or are moving toward, freeing thousands, too, and many cities across the country have also moved to free people.  So tell Sheriff David Mahoney, District Attorney Ismael Ozanne, the judges, the Dane County board of supervisors, the department of corrections and Governor Tony Evers to Free Them All NOW, before their inaction results in untold deaths of our loved ones and community members.

  • We Can’t Just “Bounce Back”

    We Can’t Just “Bounce Back”

    Reopening Requires Science

    An Interview with Dr. Greg Gelembiuk by Dayna Long

    Dr. Gelembiuk is a scientist in Madison. He is also a member of the Community Response Team, which seeks to reduce police use of force and to establish more oversight and accountability over police. He was appointed to the Police Department Policy & Procedure Review Ad Hoc Committee in 2019.

    DL: Folks in Madison might be more familiar with your scientific approach to police accountability and reform than they are with your actual career as a scientist. I was hoping you might tell me a little bit about your background and your work and how it’s prepared you to follow the science around COVID-19?

    GG: I’m a scientist. My doctorate is in Integrative Biology with a minor in Statistics. I worked in virology and oncology for about two decades, predominantly working on DNA tumor viruses. Then subsequently I’ve worked predominantly on evolution and genetics of invasive species. So I’ve got background in a wide variety of areas in the life sciences, including a great deal of background in virology.

    DL: So I have no scientific background, like a lot of people. But at the start of this crisis I was checking the Department of Health Services website and Public Health Madison & Dane County website pretty much every day to look at the numbers. But I realized over time that they didn’t mean that much to me and I so want to hear from you. How useful are those numbers? Should they be taken with a grain of salt and is there something meaningful in those numbers that people can take away from them? 

    GG: They shouldn’t be taken with a grain of salt. However, they also represent a gross underestimate because of undertesting. The actual number of infections is probably roughly an order of magnitude higher than the confirmed number of infections. And undertesting also means that a lot of deaths due to Covid-19 are not being recorded.

    I’ll also mention that I was highly critical of Public Health Madison & Dane County (PHM & DC) at the outset because back in mid-March, they seemed predominantly concerned with reassuring Madison. They had an online poster. The main feature of the poster was a big fat zero, that we had zero cases here, and then accompanying text saying that we were at low risk. This was at a point when I was pressing for immediate enactment of social distancing policies and in my view, PHM & DC was entirely failing to fill its proper role at that point. Any epidemiologist recognized that we were about to be hit and that there probably already was community spread going on here. And yet that was not the messaging that PHM & DC was providing. 

    DL: Have your feelings about folks going to those websites changed at all? Is it useful for me as a person living in Madison to look at the number of cases or the number of deaths every day?

    GG: Deaths are a lagging indicator. If you track the trend of cases that will tell you something. Now again I’ll note that we’re grossly undertesting and constraints on test availability will distort the curve. But still the trajectory of the curve will give you some important information. 

    DL: My understanding as a person following the news was that a lot of people will not even know that they have COVID-19. It seems like a large number of people may not have symptoms at all. But what you’ve been saying is that that’s maybe not the case and that over time more people have had symptoms than was initially reported. What’s your understanding of that picture at this point? 

    GG: With COVID-19, some fraction of people will be true asymptomatics — they’ll never experience symptoms. Now those people may actually have, for example, lung damage if you look with a CT scan, but they won’t be feeling any symptoms yet they’re contributing to transmission. There’s another large segment of people who will be pre-symptomatic, will be transmitting the virus, but will not yet be experiencing symptoms. So for example, the World Health Organization (WHO) noted that looking at numbers from China that people who were tested and were found to be positive and at the time were asymptomatic, about three-quarters of them went on to develop symptoms. 

    The fraction of true asymptomatics who will never develop symptoms is not yet well established. It’s somewhere probably in the range between 7% and 40%. Right now my ballpark guess would be maybe about a quarter (25%). But there are a lot of other people who are pre-symptomatic, so temporarily not experiencing symptoms but then will go on to develop them.  

    The most important take home from all that is that much of the transmission, about half, is from people who, at the time, are not experiencing symptoms. Right now, all of our testing is of people who are experiencing symptoms and usually testing is only available to those who are experiencing severe symptoms. That’s a problem. Because if you don’t test asymptomatics – if you don’t test in a ubiquitous manner – testing all people at pretty high frequency – then you’re not going to be able to suppress the virus. 

    DL: Right, because you can’t track the spread then. That makes sense. 

    GG: Right. There’s some very good public health plans that are coming out. One from Paul Romer, also one from the Rockefeller Foundation, there are good plans for suppressing it with a combination of ubiquitous testing and intensive contact tracing. That’s where we have to go. That’s what South Korea did, very successfully. That’s what we’ve failed to do so far. 

    Now, given how widely it’s spread, there needs to be some kind of technological innovation to be able to test that large a number. That innovation is already well under way. There’s a protocol called SwabSeq that would allow really large, population-scale testing. One lab tech using that protocol could test a thousand samples a day. If you actually use an automated system, like robotic systems, you could test a hundred thousand in a day and that’s just with one machine operated by one tech. I’ve been arguing that this needs to be implemented ASAP and that it would be good to have a pilot program here in Madison. You could test, for example, first responders and healthcare workers since they’re the people who are most likely to transmit if they’re infected, as an initial pilot. It would also be good to include all staff and residents of nursing homes, given their vulnerability. Other methods such as testing using a surface plasmon resonance approach would take slightly longer to work out and deploy at scale, but would allow for cheap, quick testing of everyone with results in only a few minutes.

    DL: Is science also susceptible to pressure by politicians and businesses and their interests? What are some examples you’ve seen of that sort of thing during the COVID-19 crisis? 

    GG: Oh yeah. Science is, unfortunately, susceptible to this. A perfect example is the recent, terrible quality studies that have come out from a group at Stanford. That includes a study of seroprevalence (the level of a pathogen in a population, as measured in blood serum) in Santa Clara County and a study of seroprevalence in Los Angeles County. This group is doing incredibly poor science. If you look at their paper on Santa Clara County, there were simple math errors. There were errors in design, it wasn’t randomized. There were major problems with how they were recruiting people. People who believed they’d been exposed to COVID-19 were much more likely to enter this study. And they lied to recruit test subjects and violated informed consent requirements. Their confidence intervals were just inherently wrong. They were using technology that has not been adequately vetted and that is known to give a high false positive rate. 

    A lot of people seem to misunderstand the logic of epidemiology. The social distancing we’re doing now – all that does is temporarily freezes in place the situation where infection has not swept through the population. That buys us time. It doesn’t resolve the situation. 

    So what they’re putting out is a hot mess. And yet it got a lot of coverage. It got an article in the New York Times where the reporter failed to interview any of the numerous scientists who were pointing out that this study was actually complete trash. [Their study] was widely publicized by conservative media, claiming that Covid-19 was no worse than the flu. Now one of the interesting things I’ll note is that when the same group released the initial tech report that described their Los Angeles study, the place where it was first published was the conservative GOP blog RedState. Now it’s very telling that these scientists chose to first release their publication there. What you’re seeing in some cases like this is far outside the norms of how science is supposed to operate. 

    So you do have a problem with political pressure affecting the science and the public’s understanding of the science. You can see what’s happening with the CDC. I have enormous respect for Dr. Fauci, but you can tell that he has to toe the line to a certain extent and he’s not able to speak entirely freely, to the point where he has had to basically fall on his sword at times. Meanwhile the CDC had been, to a large extent, gutted by the Trump Administration driving out scientists by budget cuts from the current administration. The quality of the work that the CDC has done recently is far inferior to the quality of the work it’s historically done. So yeah, political pressures can have an enormous impact – an unfortunate impact – on the science. 

    DL: Given the potential for science to be distorted for political means, one of my concerns for myself and for other workers is understanding when it’s actually safe to go back to work, because our priorities, like staying healthy and safe, aren’t the same as our employers’ priorities. We’re already seeing a lot of pressure from the Republican party in our state to reopen. Do you have any advice for folks about evaluating the situation for themselves? What things need to happen before we reach a point where that’s a realistic and safe thing for non-essential workers?

    GG: The only way that that could happen is with a program of ubiquitous testing, intensive contact tracing, and then quarantine. Without that, it’s not going to be safe to go back to work. There’s going to hopefully be a vaccine but the earliest I would expect a vaccine availability is maybe eighteen months. 

    A lot of people seem to misunderstand the logic of epidemiology. The social distancing we’re doing now – all that does is temporarily freezes in place the situation where infection has not swept through the population. That buys us time to do other things like testing, contact tracing, developing better therapy, developing a vaccine. That buys us time. It doesn’t resolve the situation. 

    As soon as social distancing is relaxed, the epidemic which has basically been frozen in place at a lower number, will then again take off in an exponential fashion sweeping through the population. There seems to be this widespread misunderstanding that as numbers have plateaued or if numbers are going down, then you can reopen. From an epidemiological perspective, that is wrong. That makes absolutely no sense. You cannot safely reopen, you cannot safely resume your old practices and your usual work conventions until you’ve really suppressed the virus. 

    Right now the only practical means for doing that in the short term is ubiquitous testing and extensive contact tracing. 

    DL: And we don’t have that in Wisconsin, of course.

    GG: No. In fact, it’s not happening anywhere in the US. It’s not close to happening anywhere in the US. For this to happen properly in the US we will need roughly around thirty million tests done a day. That’s possible with the technology that I was mentioning earlier, with a logistical system set in place to really collect and process the samples. So basically you need a situation where, for example, everybody is spitting in a tube and sending it to a test center and tests are being run on [the samples] and you do that, maybe, every week or so. 

    DL: Have you taken a look at the Badger Bounce Back Plan? What do you think of that? 

    GG: Okay, one – I feel some sympathy for the Evers administration given the pressure they’re under, given that the Republicans are now appealing the Stay At Home order to the State Supreme Court. However, the plan as written is garbage. If you look at the plan it does not follow the logic of epidemiology at all. The gating criteria the state is using to determine if we can begin reopening under the plan is a decrease across a fourteen day period in the number of new cases. That’s insane. 

    If you’re at a very high level and you decrease for fourteen days, you’re still at a very high level off the ground. It’s basically equivalent to someone who jumped out of a plane with a parachute, the parachute has slowed their fall, and then they say, “Oh. For a period of time my fall has been slower so I’ll take the parachute off now.” It’s crazy. 

    You know, another criteria in the plan is that there’s been some progress made on the amount of testing. That means nothing. What does it mean to make some progress on the amount of testing? You do a dozen more tests in a week and that’s criteria for reopening? The plan makes no scientific sense. Any reopening plan should be using the World Health Organization criteria, which are well thought out and fully scientifically defensible.

    I’ll mention one other thing. I’ve written correspondence to Evers office. There’s been no reply. There was a letter that I and ten other scientists from the University of Wisconsin, predominantly professors, wrote to the Governor’s office – and sent it to his Chief of Staff as well as the staff for Mandela Barnes. And there’s been zero reply. Among other things, the letter pointed to what needed to be done with testing and also suggested that Evers administration should tap scientists, including UW scientists, to set up a scientific advisory panel, which is really needed, especially if you look at the Badger Bounce Back Plan. 

    I feel sympathy for Evers and want to see substantial support for Evers given the pressure from Republicans. But the only way to deal with this properly is to actually follow the science. 

    DL: What developments in the science around COVID-19 are you looking for? Are there sources that you feel good about that lay people could also follow along with? 

    GG: Scientific developments that I’m looking at: improvements in therapies; progress on potential vaccines, though again, that won’t come out for a very long time; looking at improvements in modeling that can provide more accurate projections. Clinically, improvements in testing methodologies, new developments in serology testing. Those are a few of the things that I’m tracking and that people should keep an eye out for. 

    There are a lot of good sources out there. I would recommend people follow Carl T Bergstrom on Twitter. He’s often got very good analysis. And there are a lot of other scientists on Twitter who are providing good, meaningful analysis: Natalie Dean, Jennifer Nuzzo, Eric Topol, and Mark Lipsitch are some examples. As far as online magazines, the journal Nature is good; Science Magazine is good. There’s a lot of stuff that people can access that really can speak to a mass audience and that provide good analysis and helps people understand what’s going on. 

    Carl Bergstrom especially cuts through the bullshit. And there’s a lot of bullshit out there right now. Like the IHME model, for example, is trash. Yet that has been treated as the most influential model in the US. But it’s fundamentally flawed, it’s not really an epidemiological model at all. It’s based on assumptions that are known to be totally incorrect. Its predictions – on expected number of deaths, on dates to expect peaks, etc. – have consistently been very wrong in both the U.S. and other nations. No-one should be using or referencing it. And Bergstrom has provided very trenchant analysis of the flaws in that model, as well as analysis of a lot of other relevant science.



    Red Madison is grateful to Dr. Gelembiuk for his contributions and encourages more scientists and healthcare professionals to share their knowledge about COVID-19 and help workers navigate pressure to reopen in unsafe conditions. If you are interested in sharing your perspective with Red Madison, you can send us an email at redmadison (at) googlegroups (dot) com.

  • Organizing for Real Safety and Security during “Safer at Home”

    Organizing for Real Safety and Security during “Safer at Home”

    by Joe Evica

    In a show of blatant disregard for the health and safety of Wisconsin residents, dozens of business and trade associations in the state signed onto an open letter calling on Governor Evers to set a firm date to begin reopening Wisconsin Businesses on April 24th. Their calls were supported by the far-right wing in Madison organizing for an in-person protest on April 24th to re-open the state.


    This “firm date” set by business interests in the state of Wisconsin flies in the face of scientific recommendations. Scientists at the University of Washington Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation have created a model which suggests that the peak of the impacts of the virus in Wisconsin could come as quickly as April 12th, but that is only when scientists adjust the model to assume that we will continue full social distancing measures through the entire month of May.


    Luckily for everyone in Wisconsin, Governor Evers ignored these calls and the Wisconsin Department of Health Services extended the Safer-At-Home order through May 26th. But the decision only further inflamed the opposition. At the time of this writing, over 3,000 people have indicated through Facebook that they will attend the protest, with another 12,000 marked as interested.


    It’s no surprise for socialists and progressives who have time and again witnessed businesses ignore the vital messages from scientists across the world in favor of their profit margins. Capitalists and their politicians have long been ignoring the recommendations of scientists to reduce and eventually forgo completely the use of fossil fuels by 2030 in order to prevent a climate catastrophe. Unfortunately, the economic system as it is currently set up prioritizes the extraction of oil and gas in pursuit of profit over and above the wellbeing of people and our environment.

    For those who continue to work through the crisis, many employers have not done everything in their power to ensure the safety of their workers. This is where organizing within our workplaces and communities becomes essential to our ability to come out of this crisis with as little damage as possible.


    But we also know we can’t go on as we are. As things currently stand, the burden of this health crisis has fallen squarely on Wisconsin workers who have applied for unemployment at unprecedented rates. At the end of this crisis, it is virtually guaranteed that thousands of Wisconsin workers will have permanently lost their jobs, and as a result also lost their access to other necessities like health care. For those who continue to work through the crisis, many employers have not done everything in their power to ensure the safety of their workers. This is where organizing within our workplaces and communities becomes essential to our ability to come out of this crisis with as little damage as possible.


    As workers, we know what we need in order to ensure a safe workplace as essential employees. Besides practicing social distancing measures and adequate access to PPE, we must be collectively advocating for paid sick leave in the event anyone is our family gets sick, hazard pay for employees working with direct contact to the public, and additional flexibility and time off for families with children who are required to stay home as a result of the closure of schools and daycares.


    We also know what we need in order to make sure this crisis does not result in thousands of additional homeless families on the street. A one-time $1,200 stimulus will not last more than a month after considering rent/mortgage, food, and other expenses. Therefore, we must be demanding a moratorium on all rent and mortgage payments until the end of the health crisis so that people can stretch the funds to cover food and other related expenses, rather than have the funds act as a subsidy for landlords and banks.


    Additionally, while an expansion of unemployment benefits through July is currently helping to keep many workers who have been furloughed afloat, legislation needs to be passed at both the state and federal level which ensures employees remain on their payroll at work to maintain health insurance benefits during the pandemic. As many other socialists have pointed out already, pushing millions of people into unemployment during a global pandemic will result in more death, as those without insurance will wait longer to seek treatment from medical professionals. These are just a few of the basic demands that working-class people need in order to survive through this health crisis.


    Winning these basic demands, in addition to extending the Safer-at-Home order through the month of May, will be no easy task. We face a state legislature whose thorough contempt for workers is well-documented over the last ten years. Governor Evers can be described at best as a moderate who is all too willing to give into the interests of business if we cannot build an equally formidable opponent to those interests. Evidence for this was put on display nationally as Evers waited until the day before the Wisconsin election to attempt to postpone it, leaving no time for progressives and socialists across the state to organize as response to the Wisconsin Supreme Court when they easily over-ruled his order.


    At the city level, Mayor Satya Rhodes-Conway has abdicated responsibility for the crisis, saying that the city’s hands are tied by laws which preclude them from doing anything of significance. They have opted instead to encourage the plethora of Madison’s NGOs and the business community to commit donations providing need-based aid to our poor and homeless population who are deemed as deserving of funds. Thus, if the Wisconsin Republican Party’s response to this crisis has been to actively make things worse, the leaders of the Democratic Party have accomplished much of the same through their spineless inactivity.

    We will need to build a movement of unions, immigrant rights groups, NGOs, socialists, and other progressive organizations who can collectively exert the kind of power necessary to pressure the state into action.


    Despite the reluctance of our elected officials to respond to the health crisis, we’ve witnessed a number of incredible workplace struggles within the city of Madison over the last several weeks which have secured numerous important victories. Petitions by city workers, such as those by Madison Metro Transit employees, secured additional paid sick leave, safety provisions, including free fares and back-door entry, bathrooms at transfer points, and other key demands. Rather than waiting on the union leadership at Teamsters Local 695 to act on their behalf, workers circulated petitions and demanded meetings with management to discuss how they would implement new policies to keep them safe.


    Additionally, healthcare workers at both UW and Meriter Hospital have organized petitions to demand additional paid sick leave and proper PPE to combat COVID-19 in the workplace. Willy Street Co-Op workers also secured additional paid leave from their employer through their newly formed union, UE Local 1186. If this health crisis has taught us anything, it is that a credible organizing approach in the workplace is the most important factor as to whether workers will bear the brunt of the repercussions from the global pandemic.


    As things currently stand, victories by workers and unions in the city have been detached from one another. And while the Wisconsin Department of Health Services has extended Governor Evers’ Safer-At-Home order through May 26th, we know that the families will still experience hardship without more relief. If we hope to stand a chance in pressuring the state legislature and Governor Evers to implement a truly safe Safer-At-Home and implement the policy demands described above, we will need to build a movement of unions, immigrant rights groups, NGOs, socialists, and other progressive organizations who can collectively exert the kind of power necessary to pressure the state into action.


    For this reason, the Madison Chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America is inviting any and all organizations to join us in for a public discussion and organizing meeting about how to make Safer-At-Home truly safe for working class families across Wisconsin on Tuesday, April 21 at 7 pm. We will discuss demands for lifting the burden of protecting the public off the shoulders of workers and their families and making this extended Stay-At-Home order tenable for all.

  • Yorktown Estates/Resident Services, Inc.

    Yorktown Estates/Resident Services, Inc.

    “My partner told them our income was reduced by half and they emailed us about a proposed payment plan that still required the full rent before the next month’s was due.”

    Resident Services, Inc.
    Contact Form

    Yorktown Estates
    Phone:
    608-233-9533
    Text: 608-401-4341
    Fax: 608-233-1011
    Email:  info[at]yorktownestates[dot]com


    These are people’s stories in their own words. Submissions are edited only for clarity.
    Submit to the Wall of Shame

  • Hy-Vee

    Hy-Vee

    “The store director knew catering orders for more than 10 people were being fulfilled and not being individually wrapped by the kitchen staff; enabling the dangerous behavior of his customers. Online ordering employees have one tiny office everyone likes to congregate and eat in. The kitchen brings food to said office (for the employees) instead of the larger restaurant seating area that is now off limits to customers. A large record sale poster that indicated we made roughly quarter of a billion dollars in one week was placed next to a letter to employees about how great we’ve done and that we would get and extra $1-2/hour for holidays. Holiday…not hazard. Our employee discount went from 10% to 20% for one week so we could “have a wonderful Easter”. Again, we made quarter of a billion dollars in one week and for it we got holiday pay.”

    Hy-Vee
    Contact Form
    Corporate Office Phone:
    (515) 267-2800


    These are people’s stories in their own words. Submissions are edited only for clarity.
    Submit to the Wall of Shame

  • Pharmaceutical Product Development (PPD)

    Pharmaceutical Product Development (PPD)

    “Until recently, the company provided all employees a timecode to use if we couldn’t work due to COVID-19, including being ill, taking care of an ill family member, or taking care of children who could no longer go to school. As of April 6, the timecode was retired and employees are now left with using their PTO or short-term disability (which does not take effect until after a week of using PTO). Some employees can work from home, but those who are required to work in-lab that develop symptoms will now have to choose between paying their bills or self-quarantining if they don’t have enough PTO.”

    PPD Letter
    Text of the email announcing the new COVID-19 policy

    Pharmaceutical Product Development (PPD)
    Twitter |
    Facebook


    These are people’s stories in their own words. Submissions are edited only for clarity.
    Submit to the Wall of Shame

  • Colonial Property Management

    Colonial Property Management

    “No notices about easing rent or late fees. No easing sublet requirements (which put the onus on the renter and holds them responsible for rent and damages from subletter).”

    Colonial Property Management

    Randall Park Rentals
    Phone: (608) 251-2715
    Fax: (608) 251-4443
    Email: randallpark[at]cmanagement[dot]net

    Capitol Park Apartments
    Phone: (608) 467-2001
    Fax: (608) 467-2977
    Email:
    capitolpark[at]cmanagement[dot]net

    Skyview Apartments
    Phone: (608) 245-0753
    Fax: (608) 819-8781
    Email: skyview[at]cmanagement[dot]net

    Oakview Garden Apartments
    Phone: (608) 837-8369
    Fax: (608) 837-2703
    Email: oakview[at]cmanagement[dot]net


    These are people’s stories in their own words. Submissions are edited only for clarity.
    Submit to the Wall of Shame

  • Extended Stay America

    Extended Stay America

    “I currently live at the extended stay America. I was supposed to move into my apartment in April 1st, but that fell through. Now that my money is tied up into an apartment and am waiting for a refund I am unable to pay rent here. I am out of work as well and waiting for unemployment.

    So they have told me I must move out with total disregard for tenants rights. I have been here for over 60 days, so I know my rights. They harass me daily insisting I am wrong and that I need to move out and that they are filing in court Monday (or whatever the next business day is), which they cannot do.

    I have also told them I’m happy to give then what gets refunded to me hopefully next week. They keep telling me that the next business day is the deadline, when the deadline is actually whenever the court allows them to evict me. I feel for people who do not know the laws and end up leaving.

    They also tried to get me to move into a different room so that my tenancy is voided and the time starts all over again. Therefore, if I didn’t pay rent they can just have the police remove me. It’s just shady as heck! They gave me a 5 day notice and when that was up told me that was all they needed to do in order for me to have to leave.

    Aside from that, the office staff does not practice social distancing. In the past two weeks at least 4 staff members have left. Have they been diagnosed? Were they sick? Were they fired for not doing what has been asked of them putting their own personal safety at risk? We will never know.

    At any rate, they now changed the cleanings from weekly to every other week stating social distancing. They shouldn’t be cleaning at all! No cleaning person should be forced to step foot in a person’s room unless they have checked out entirely. The staff is not being provided with any masks. Just gloves. Two cleaning people, at least one office staff member, and the fulltime maintenance person is gone.

    Now as of 4/10 they have signs up about not communing in the lobby and only one person in the elevator. Either way, I’m not sure what is worse- them trying to force people out in the midst of a pandemic or them not providing all safety measures possible for their staff.”

    Extended Stay America – Madison – Old Sauk Road
    Phone: 
    608-833-2121
    Email: mwe[at]extendedstay[dot]com

    Extended Stay America – Madison – Junction Court
    Phone:
    608-833-1400
    Email: mdw[at]extendedstay[dot]com


    These are people’s stories in their own words. Submissions are edited only for clarity.
    Submit to the Wall of Shame